8

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
8
Participant
Anonymous
Submission date
Main Submission File
Main Submission Automated Transcript

I fully support the Voice proposal, whether it be legislated or considered for inclusion in the
Constitution with only one key proviso relating to fairness and relevance.

This proviso would address the need for the Voice to serve people who are genuinely part of the
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community of interest.

It should not be diluted by accepting input or interference by people jumping on the bandwagon eg.

- Someone who is of European background but thinks growing a long beard and writing about
Indigenous history gives them the right to comment
- Someone who has lived all their life as a non-Indigenous person then late in life finds they
are perhaps 1-32th Indigenous due to a great-great-great grandfather someone in their past,
and thinking that gives them the right to comment through the Voice

I think Australians will have good faith if they know the Voice is reserved for people with a genuine
stake in the debate … not those who have no lived experience of being part of the Indigenous
community.

This would be especially relevant if the Voice is part of our Constitution as 100 years into the future
it would be conceivable that someone who is 1-128th Indigenous could try to force themselves on a
local, regional or national body in the way that a certain American politician tried to do, passing
themselves off as native American for personal advancement.