2823

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2823
Participant
Megan Williams
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Megan Williams

To whom it may concern

Co-design process: Submission for Megan Williams

I am Wiradjuri and have worked for two decades to advocate for the use of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander people’s knowledges and needs in program design and
evaluation, research, ethics and university curriculum, especially to improve health
services for people in prison and post-release. I am Chair of the Justice Health and
Forensic Mental Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee, Research Lead at
the University of Sydney’s National Centre for Cultural Competence and a member of
the Sydney Institute of Criminology. I am miimi sister of Mibbinbah community
organisation and contributor to social journalism company Croakey.org including for the
#JusticeCOVID, #JustJustice and #CroakeyVoices series.

Why do you think the Uluru Statement from the Heart is important?
The Uluru Statement is a First Nations Voice, and asks for a First Nations Voice to be
protected by the Constitution, which will mean that agreement-making and truth-telling
between First Nations people and others in Australia can finally be done on equal terms.
With Voice, we can begin the journey of coming together after a struggle – Makarrata.

How could a Voice to Parliament improve the lives of your community?
There is a real risk is that constitutional recognition will be separated from the idea of a
First Nations Voice. This risks the government putting in place a legislative Voice and
pursuing a symbolic form of constitutional recognition that does not accord with the
wishes of First Nations people ourselves. First Nations people have the right to self-
determine matters that affect our lives according to the United Nations Declaration on
the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Government policies often support this. A Voice to
Parliament means these rights can be achieved.

Why is it important for Indigenous people to have a say in the matters that affect them?
It is about respecting what people in Australia envision for us as a country, as well as
achieving the rights of Indigenous people. For example In 2020, 94% of the general
community agreed it is important that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have a
say in matters that affect them. And, 86% of the general community think it’s important to
establish a representative Indigenous body. Further, 81% of the general community
think it is important to protect that body within the constitution. So, having a say respects
that people in Australia want us to have a say. And, having a say means being able to
self-determine and match needs and aspirations to decisions to resources, to then plan
for improvements. First Nations people overwhelmingly experience injustices and
inequities that are unacceptable in a modern, successful economy like Australia and
mean that the voting public's vision of itself is not matched with reality.

Why do you think it's important to enshrine the Voice to Parliament in the Constitution,
rather than include it only in legislation?
The Morrison Government needs to hear NOW that constitutional enshrinement of a
First Nations Voice has overwhelming support among the Australian voting public.
Constitutional enshrinement of a First Nations Voice is the only form of recognition that
garnered the collective endorsement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples
themselves. Only through a constitutional referendum will the Voice have the public
legitimacy and authority it needs to make sure the government and Parliament will take
its advice seriously. Only constitutional enshrinement can give the Voice the necessary
stability and certainty in its operation, free from the fear of abolition by one government
to the next, while allowing for flexibility in design. If the government doesn’t take
leadership on this issue, we, the Australian people, will lose the opportunity to achieve
the wider objectives of constitutional recognition of First Nations, and lose the
opportunity to say that we are a nation committed to developing and sustaining a
respectful relationship with First Nations peoples.

The Referendum Council recommended that a referendum be held as soon as
practicable to enshrine a Voice to Parliament and commence the journey to Voice,
Treaty and Truth. The Referendum Council was confident that the detail on a Voice
would be worked out after a referendum supervised by the Australian parliament.

Thank you,
Megan Williams