2634

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2634
Participant
Natasha Tetradis
Submission date

Natasha Tetradis

Dear Co-Design Body

Co-design process: Submission for Natasha Tetradis

I Natasha believe First Nations people should be recognised by the Australian government. It is time for a First Nations Voice to Parliament protected by the Constitution..

Why do you think the Uluru Statement from the Heart is important?
I work within the government and believe the voices of those people affected by Government policies/ strategies should be heard.

Why is it important for Indigenous people to have a say in the matters that affect them?
People who are impacted by law/ policy changes, should always have a voice in matters that impact their way of life.

Why do you think it's important to enshrine the Voice to Parliament in the Constitution, rather than include it only in legislation?
Because the Constitution impacts legislation, legislation does not affect the Constitution.

How could a Voice to Parliament improve the lives of your community?
It would reflect how proposed actual changes have impacted the community honestly, be that negative or positive.

Thank you,
Natasha Tetradis