2617

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2617
Participant
Marcus Dahl
Submission date
Main Submission File
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Marcus Dahl

Oxford OX2 6QD
United Kingdom

April 2021

Professor Dr Marcia Langton AO and Professor Tom Calma AO
Co-Chairs, Senior Advisory Group, Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process

Submission for Co-design process

Who I am
I am an Australian lawyer and postgraduate student, originally from Sydney, writing from the
University of Oxford. I studied law and science at the Australian National University before
working for judges at the Constitutional Court of South Africa and Federal Court of
Australia. I completed my legal training placements with Aboriginal Legal Service in the
ACT and WA. I am now studying human rights and constitutional law in depth at Oxford.

Acknowledgement
I acknowledge the deep teaching, experience and welcoming inclusion I have received
throughout my education from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. I also
acknowledge the countless generations of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who
have cared for and continue to care for all the corners of the beautiful country I call home.
Australia's rich cultural history is a privilege which has always guided our nation and its
many peoples and will continue to do so.

Why do you think the Uluru Statement from the Heart is important?
Other submissions to the Co-Design Process have clearly articulated the importance of
listening to and acting on the Uluru Statement. They have made powerful arguments
describing sovereignty and the fundamental importance of the three steps that must be taken
in voice, treaty and truth. I am writing to add one small perspective to the wave of support for
the three key goals of the Uluru Statement: voice, treaty and truth. The Uluru Statement is a
generous gift and I am grateful for it, and this submission is one small part of my thanks.

Sovereignty has never been ceded. Adequate action in response to that fact has never been
taken. For decades, Australian politicians have stalled. But in 2017, the Uluru Statement from
the Heart gave the Government a near-consensus roadmap on what comes next. Sovereignty
cannot be ignored. The Uluru Statement is a gift to all Australians, and a map on the path to
change. So much time, energy, compromise and good faith went into the Uluru Statement.
The Government must hear what it has to say, and take up the call to walk together in a
movement of all Australians towards a better future.

How could a Voice to Parliament improve the lives of your community?
A Voice to Parliament will help inform politicians in making better, more compassionate
decisions on issues that affect Indigenous people. It will guide legislation on many issues
from health, education and integrated service delivery to local leadership and native title. It
could also improve political discourse and awareness for non-Indigenous Australians. We
have so much to learn from what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have to say.
This is the case now more than ever as global challenges come to face us. I support a Voice to
Parliament not only as a symbolic step, but also as a practical one. It will make Australia
better, improving the quality of our democracy and the outcomes that come from it. Voice
will help stop politicians repeating the same mistakes in Indigenous policy over and over. Of
course, it will not fix everything, and must work together with treaty and truth, but Voice is
necessary. Importantly, it will also remind our politicians to always listen.

Why is it important for Indigenous people to have a say in the matters that affect them?
Having a say is key to self-determination, an Indigenous right recognised internationally.
Indigenous sovereignty is a fact, not an academic invention. Australia was claimed for the
British crown illegally, and that fact, although acknowledged, has not been fully reckoned
with structurally. Indigenous people should have a say in the matters that affect them for
many reasons, including because this say is what was wrongly taken away through
colonisation and oppression. Reconciliation demands that we listen now.

A comment on democracy
I wish to add one comment about democracy, in response to the negative rhetoric on this
point by the Government. When the Government rejected the Uluru Statement in 2017, it
argued that Voice would be undemocratic, undermining Australian values of one-person-one-
vote and the two-chamber system of Parliament. This argument misunderstands both
democracy and Australia. In democratic theory, deliberative political processes like Voice
can enhance democracy. And in Australia, there is unfinished constitutional business
meaning that doing nothing is not an adequate response, since it takes an illusion of stable
democratic legitimacy for granted. The legitimacy of liberal democracies may not be secure
while majoritarian decision-making excludes under-represented minority groups, especially
where Indigenous minorities have had a political system imposed upon them. Indigenous
people can be practically excluded from meaningful democratic participation through
constitutional imposition, majoritarianism, inequality, racism or ongoing injustice.
Specialised political decision-making mechanisms which include and consult Indigenous
Voice are a democratic method for improved participation and representation.

Why do you think it's important to enshrine the Voice to Parliament in the Constitution,
rather than include it only in legislation?
There are several reasons for constitutional entrenchment, including:

(1) This is what Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people actually asked for
through the Uluru Statement, and that importantly deserves respect.
(2) Entrenchment has an expressive power for our country. The symbolic process of
constitutional change is meaningful and people will remember it.
(3) Entrenchment means only the people, and not partisan governments of the day,
can try and take it away in the future. The past has taught us this lesson.
(4) Entrenchment provides stability, but need not contain every detail, allowing for
flexibility in the specific implementation of Voice over time.
(5) Entrenchment provides the Voice with legitimacy and authority, through both the
referendum process and the status a constitutional role provides.

It is a privilege to support the Uluru Statement and the path towards voice, treaty and truth.

Yours sincerely,
Marcus Dahl