2220

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2220
Participant
Dr Alison Richards
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Dr Alison Richards

South Yarra VIC 3141

Submission to NIAA Co-design Process 2021

Like many white Australians, I had reached my twenties before I met anyone who identified
themselves as Aboriginal. I knew about the Referendum of 1967 and was vaguely aware of
leaders like Charlie Perkins and actions like the Freedom Rides in NSW, but had been taught
to think about Aboriginal people as mostly belonging to some unspecified pre-history, a
'dreamtime' conveniently lacking any focus or connection to modern Australia. I was lucky
enough to be a student at the Australian National University when the Aboriginal Embassy's
beach umbrella went up outside Parliament House in 1972; encountering those young, angry,
informed and articulate Aboriginal activists changed my viewpoint forever. A shock and a
Eureka moment at the time, I now know that it was only the beginning of a lifelong journey
to learn, unlearn and re-learn - to comprehend and acknowledge the horrors of the past and to
listen to, understand and respect the voices of our First Peoples. While I am honoured now to
include people of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander descent as colleagues, friends,
neighbours and members of my extended family, I am still on that journey. Many of my
fellow non-Indigenous Australians have not yet begun it.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart encapsulates the united voice of representatives of First
Nations communities from across Australia and the Torres Strait, who gathered in 2017 for
the first time in recorded history, to articulate what a meaningful dialogue with power meant
to them and what must be put in place, to achieve an effective presence for our First Peoples
within Australia's body politic. The Statement is a historic record of unparalleled
significance. It contains a generous offer; a model for ongoing co-existence based on a strong
consensus, which deserves an equally generous response from non-Indigenous leaders and
lawmakers.

While the Australian Constitution is a cumbersome document and amendments are
admittedly difficult to pass, proposing legislation to establish an Indigenous Voice to
Parliament without enshrining such a body in the Constitution simply perpetuates
condescension and inequality. There are different ways this might be managed, with
Constitutional provisions to articulate principles and dependent legislation to enact specifics,
including the establishment of a Makarratta Commission to conduct a truth-telling and
reconciliation process. Constitutional recognition of an Indigenous Voice need not preclude
subsequent initiatives including a formal treaty or treaties at a later stage; but such
recognition must be a priority, approached with determination and drafted for maximum
clarity. Unless proper recognition of our First Peoples is enshrined at the heart of our legal
system, the country cannot heal.

A sorry parade of bad policy, botched program delivery and unsatisfactory, all too frequently
tragic, outcomes has marked 'Indigenous Affairs' in what is now Australia, since white
settlement. One of the few consistent factors in official efforts to 'manage' Indigenous people
is a pattern of top-down decision-making based on a more or less consciously articulated
sense of white superiority. This has to change. Giving Indigenous people a say in matters that
affect them directly, gives us the best possible chance to at last, make a real difference. The
proposed National Indigenous Voice to Parliament cannot and must not be ‘managed’ into
becoming some purely advisory or corporate sideshow, it must have the status to ensure its

1
[Type here] deliberations a place on the national legislative agenda. Any risk to majority interests in
consequence could hardly lead to worse outcomes than what we have now. Indigenous people
across Australia, including Indigenous women, must be accorded real respect, not simply
'consulted'; they must be listened to and their opinions must count. They must have real
power. Without that, we cannot have real change.

A Voice to Parliament at Federal level and similar bodies responding to community in each
State and Territory, would give Indigenous people visibility, a necessary if not sufficient
condition for the institution of requirements, policies and procedures to ensure effective
Indigenous participation in all relevant areas of government business, as well as the
protection of Indigenous heritage. A Voice to Parliament would open a gateway for
communication between Indigenous people and the broader community. Most importantly, it
would stand as the foundation for Indigenous participation in Australian public life for the
next century or so, giving coming generations of emerging leaders confidence that their
presence is welcome and their voices heard.

The institution of a National Indigenous Voice to Parliament will mark the opening of new
pathways and new dialogues, new ways of addressing old and entrenched inequities. It is vital
that it be established in a way robust and open enough to support and effectively serve the
demands, the needs and the interests of our First Nations peoples in times to come.
Enshrining the Voice to Parliament in the Australian Constitution is a first but vital step on a
much longer journey.

Thank you,

Alison Richards