1945

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
1945
Participant
Belinda Collins
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Belinda Collins - Submission: In support of a First Nations Voice Protected in the Constitution
In the 2 to 3 generations since the wildly successful referendum of 1967, Australia’s
constitution still makes no mention of its First Nations people. Grave issues facing their
communities continue unabated. I have lived, studied and worked in Broken Hill, Nambucca
Heads, Wollongong, Canberra, Yass and now Melbourne. I often wonder how the Aboriginal
kids who went to school with me in Nambucca Heads in the late 60’s have fared in the
intervening decades. The chances are they have been, and still are, fighting for basic human
rights and a better life for their families. Based on appalling statistics, I doubt that their
children and grandchildren will have had the same opportunities as my own. I feel shame,
frustration and bewilderment that the referendum’s implied promise of equality has not
been realised.

Many times in the past 60 odd years, bodies representing First Nations people -
Commissions, Committees, Conferences and Councils - have been established with the
objective of providing advice on laws and policies for the betterment of their lives. These
representative bodies can and have been disestablished at the whim of successive
governments. Progress is halted, corporate knowledge lost and the fundamental divide
between life outcomes for First Nations people and other Australians continues. Meanwhile,
the government remains free to make laws and policies about issues which affect First
Nations people without consultation or consent. Many of these are unhelpful and often
detrimental.

Then in 2017 came the gift to non-indigenous Australia of the Uluru Statement from the
Heart from our First Nations people. This was the result of years of planning, months of
dialogues in towns and cities around Australia and finally a convention at Uluru where a
consensus was reached and the statement composed. This profoundly generous statement
filled me with hope that structural change would soon be possible.

In the Uluru statement, First Nations people speak of the torment of their powerlessness.
They call for “the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution.” This
would empower them to advise on laws and policies around issues directly affecting their
communities such as child mortality, youth suicide, poverty, disproportionately high
incarceration rates, deaths in custody, children being removed from families and children as
young as 10 years of age being imprisoned. Policies guided by their protected Voice would
mean the difference between life and death. The torment they speak of in their Statement is
a national disgrace. True empowerment via a protected Voice would end their torment.

Alas, the ensuing response from the government, to the gift of the Uluru Statement from the
Heart, was to reject its main call, for “the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in
the Constitution.” Instead, the government has proposed an approach which has failed many
times before - legislating a voice but stopping short of protecting it in the constitution. This
would leave the voice vulnerable to removal. This vulnerability has the effect of inhibiting
robust and honest debate. And as is the case now, the government would have no
compulsion to listen to advice or to act upon it and would not be accountable to the
Australian people.

In his 2020 Closing the Gap report, the Prime Minister writes of his government’s
commitment to First Nations people having a “real say”. In my mind, a “real say” is a Voice
enshrined in the Constitution. The Membership Model for the Constitutional Voice should be
inclusive and fair in its selection process so as to maximise the opportunity for previously
unheard voices to have a say.

As well as a Voice to Parliament, the Uluru Statement from the Heart calls for a Makarrata
Commission. I look forward to this. With a Voice enshrined in the constitution, negotiation of
treaties could be done on more equal footing because the Voice would carry authority. And
Truth Telling is long overdue.
I implore the government to schedule a Voice referendum. I look forward to the public
information and education campaign which will accompany it. I will vote YES.