Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.


Submission Number
Hayley Lye
Submission date
Main Submission File
Main Submission Automated Transcript

26 March 2021

I write as a 22-year-old non-Indigenous university student from Katherine NT in response to the Interim
Voice Report.

It is my view, that the First Nations Voice, as called for by the Uluru Statement of the Heart be enshrined
in the Constitution. The Uluru Statement of the Heart represents the desires of Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander peoples across the country; peoples that have been frequently politically forgotten by
successive governments and parliament. Constitutional enshrinement of a First Nations Voice will give
it enduring legitimacy, provide for a national discussion through the referendum process and reflect
Australia’s Indigenous history.

The Voice should be enshrined in the Constitution in order to provide it with the necessary legitimacy
to form its much-needed function in the Australian Parliament. Through constitutional enshrinement,
the Voice will not be able to be abolished at the whim of Parliament or easily ignored. The public
participation required of a constitutional referendum, as opposed to legislation, will ensure that the
design of the Voice is consistent with the expectations endorsed by the public. An amendment approved
by the people voting in a referendum will educate the public on the importance of a Voice in parliament
and give the discussion of our country’s deep Indigenous past the recognition it deserves.

The necessary legislation needed to set up a First Nations Voice should not be passed until a
constitutional amendment has taken place. If legislation was passed before a referendum, it would limit
the potential for achieving real transformative constitutional reform and reconciliation and would
reduce the likelihood that the Voice would ever be constitutionally enshrined. This would be
disrespectful to the demands contained in the Uluru Statement of the Heart that has been collectively
endorsed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

Constitutional enshrinement of a First Nations Voice would see Australia’s true history acknowledged
and respected in a way that has a distinct standing and an enduring impact. As a young person in
Australia, in this time of progress and acceptance, it is not fathomable that we could consider proceeding
for another 120 years under a system of governance overseen by a document that is blind to our history.

Hayley Lye