Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.


Submission Number
Adrian Vipond
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Adrian Vipond
Earlwood NSW 2206

25 March 2021

To Co-Design Body

Submission to Co-design process

I am a non-Indigenous Australian who grew up in Lane Cove, Sydney which is land
belonging to the Cammerraygal people of the Ku-ring-gai tribe and currently reside in
Earlwood on land belonging to the Bediagal people of the Dharug clan. I have a
Law/International Studies degree from UNSW and I work as a graduate at Sydney law
firm, Gilbert + Tobin. I am also a volunteer Surf Lifesaver at Tamarama beach.

Why the Uluru Statement from the Heart is important to me
The Uluru Statement from the Heart is an incredibly important historical document that
sets out the collective views of Indigenous Australians in an unprecedented way.
Historically, Australia has caused irreparable harm to Indigenous communities and part
of what the Uluru Statement from the Heart is trying to achieve is to prevent such
atrocities from ever occurring again by ensuring that Indigenous Australians have a
voice at the highest level, so that their concerns are heard and addressed with respect
to any laws that will have an impact on them. This is fair and in the interests of justice for
all Australians. We owe it to Indigenous Australians to respect the collective views of
their leaders and take this step towards substantive change with the hope that it leads to
a fairer and more just society for all.
Why I think it's important to enshrine the Voice to Parliament in the Constitution,
rather than include it only in legislation
Constitutional enshrinement of the Voice to Parliament is important primarily because it
is currently the only form of constitutional recognition collectively endorsed by
Indigenous leaders. The Voice to Parliament represents a fundamental aspect of our
democracy and government because of the formal connection it establishes with First
Nations people. It would be completely unorthodox not to include such an important
element of our democratic institutions in the Constitution.
Moreover, constitutional enshrinement would afford the Voice to Parliament the
necessary authority and public legitimacy it needs to exercise its mandate and
encourage lawmakers to take its advice seriously. Giving the Voice to Parliament high
level recognition in the Constitution would allow it to operate with certainty, free from any
fear of abolition by successive governments whilst still allowing for flexibility in its design.
Why I think it is important for Indigenous people to have a say in the matters that
affect them
Indigenous people have and continue to be disproportionately affected by harmful laws
and policies in Australia. Part of this problem is a lack of cultural awareness and
consultation with Indigenous communities who will be affected by these laws and
policies; the identification of solutions which are ill-suited to addressing 'problems' to the
extent they are perceived as such by non-Indigenous people; and the failure of laws and
policies to address systemic racism and the root causes of issues facing Indigenous
communities. Successive governments have repeatedly failed to get this right, we owe it
to Indigenous people to design a fair democracy where they can take an active role in
the laws which affect them, not just as a matter of principle but to avoid repeating the
mistakes of our past.
Why I think think a Voice to Parliament is important
A Voice to Parliament would provide a national platform for Indigenous people to have
their voice heard and the issues they raise addressed in relation to laws which will
impact their communities. It represents a vital link between First Nations people and
Australian democracy. Most importantly, this is the mechanism that Indigenous leaders
themselves have chosen to have their say on the issues which affect them. A Voice to
Parliament will not only provide a platform in Parliament but by virtue of its status it will
help push Indigenous perspectives on Indigenous issues to the forefront of national
attention. The media will be able to report more accurately on Indigenous perspectives
and an authentic, authoritative voice on Indigenous issues will be heard clearly by the
Australian public for the first time.
Other relevant issues the Co-design Body should consider
The triggers currently being contemplated for when consultation with the Voice to
Parliament would be required are far too narrow. There are many other laws and
instruments that have a deep impact on Indigenous communities that the Voice to
Parliament should be required to consider. It is essential that the Voice to Parliament is
provided with sufficient ambit to comment and consider these laws or else there is a
major risk of diminishing its legitimacy.
In addition, it is critical that a referendum on enshrining the Voice to Parliament in the
Constitution is held before any Federal laws are passed to determine its composition /
structure. Seeing politicians and public commentators engage in a drawn-out debate on
the intricacies of the Voice to Parliament before a referendum is held would only exert a
negative influence on public support at a referendum and risks causing voter fatigue and
general complacency about Australia's responsiveness to Indigenous issues.
Historically, this proved fatal to the 'Yes' campaign for an Australian republic in 1999. It is
also crucial to maintaining the integrity of this process that Federal resourcing for the
Voice to Parliament (including consultation, design processes and implementation) is not
politicised by tying funding to the Federal election cycle.
Thank you for taking the time to consider this submission.

Yours sincerely,
Adrian Vipond