Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.


Submission Number
Submission date

Dear Sir Madam,

I write in reference to the concept to introduce a Voice for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

From a Tasmanian perspective as already mentioned we have a group of Tasmanian Aboriginal peoples that were challenged on their Aboriginality in relation to the ATSIC Elections in 2002. The Case itself handed down their decision in the AAT of the Federal Court of Australia, recognizing the groups as a person of the Aboriginal race of Australia.

An Aboriginal Elder who went through the case and was recognized later in 2010 was not charged by Tasmania Police for Illegal Fishing (Abalone). He was allowed to practice his Culture (Aboriginal Fishing Hunting and Gathering). He was advised by Tasmanian police officers that he has his laws and we have ours. He was not associated or accepted under or with the Aboriginal Lands Act 1995 of Tasmania. He was an individual still trying to prove his Indigeneity within the State of Tasmania.

The case was Patmore v Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee
[2002] FCAFC 316; 122 FCR 559.

Under the Police Powers 2003 of Tasmania. Section 83 states: "A police officer has the powers, privileges, and duties of a constable at common law or under any other Act or law". Now he wasn't charged for the fishing offense. This aboriginal elder didn't come under the Aboriginal Lands Act of 1995 or any Law such as Native Title. So the Tasmanian police officers had the power and privilege and duties of a constable at common law. The case above was heard in the Administration Appeals Tribunal, not a Court.

So I question how can the Voice be accepted when at common law under the Police Powers of Tasmania Police recognized the AAT decision. I question how can this Voice be implemented and for who?

Warm regards(redacted)



We acknowledge the Traditional Owners and custodians of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to the people, the cultures and the Elders past, present and emerging.