Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.


Submission Number
Russell Kennedy Lawyers
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript


Russell Kennedy is pleased to submit its response to the invitation to all Australians to provide
feedback on the proposals contained in the Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process Interim Report to
the Australian Government, October 2020 (Interim Report).

Russell Kennedy is a law firm practising on the land of the Bunurong Boon Wurrung and Wurundjeri
Woi Wurrong Peoples of the Eastern Kulin Nation (Melbourne) and the land of the Gadigal People of
the Eora Nation (Sydney).

We are committed to diversity and inclusion in all forms and we acknowledge the particular
importance of recognising First Nations people and contributing to a conversation about greater
recognition and visibility of First Nations people and their culture within our society and legal system.

Russell Kennedy was one of the 18 law firms that issued a joint public statement in 2019 in support of
the Uluru Statement from the Heart, and the establishment of a constitutionally enshrined First
Nations Voice. Russell Kennedy continues to support the Uluru Statement.

We are dedicated to contributing to meaningful reconciliation, as a process of truth-telling, sharing
stories and building community in the space between First Nations and other people. We are in the
process of developing a Reconciliation Action Plan, led by our RAP working group and with input from
all areas of our firm, including our Pro Bono Practice (which, amongst other work, has a partnership
with the Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service) and our Diversity & Inclusion Committee.

It is critical that non-indigenous Australians listen to the experiences and voices of First Nations
People and acknowledge the truth of Australia’s history. Furthermore, the voices of First Nations
people need to be heard in forums where decisions are made that affect them. The Indigenous Voice
proposal provides concrete opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders at a local, regional
and national level, to contribute to discussions and decision-making that impact them. It provides a
significant opportunity for our nation.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart campaign, in its response to the Interim Report, identifies three
key submission points. First, the importance of Indigenous Voice being effected by constitutional
change. Second, that this constitutional change occurs before enabling legislation is enacted. Third,
that Indigenous Voice be representative of the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander

Russell Kennedy supports these key submission points, as elaborated further below.

1 That the Australian Government honours its election commitment to a referendum
once a model for the Voice has been settled.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart represents substantial consensus of the Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander people and provides a clear statement:

“We call for the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution”.

In order for this statement to be actioned, the Australian Government has indicated a
commitment to a referendum once a model for the Voice has been settled.1 By honouring

1Interim Report to the Australian Government: Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process January 2021, From the
Heart Submission No 1, 21 January 2021 p 10.
SXT 11317865v5 EXD

this commitment, the Australian Government recognises the importance of a meaningful and
protected voice for First Nations people.

We submit that in order to give a meaningful and protected voice to First Nations people, the
Indigenous Voice must be enshrined in and protected by the Constitution. The Constitution
is the foundational document for the structure of our nation’s legal system and governance.
It is appropriate that a voice for First Nations People be recognised and protected by the
Constitution. Furthermore, a referendum provides an opportunity for all Australians, through
voting, to acknowledge and support the Indigenous Voice.

Simply passing legislation to create the Indigenous Voice will not effect the structural reform
that is vital for transformative change. There is a risk that a legislated Voice will be repealed
if it is “successful.” First Nations people have long been vulnerable to the State and excluded
from the law-making process. An Indigenous Voice protected by the Constitution ensures
certainty, and ensures that the rights of Indigenous people to be heard and to influence
decisions that affect them, are not subject to the whim of politics.

Critically, an Indigenous Voice to Parliament ensures that reconciliation has a foundation that
is more than a symbolic gesture, and one which can underpin lasting and impactful change.

2 That enabling legislation for the Voice must be passed after a referendum has been
held in the next term of Parliament.

It is critical for legislation implementing the form of the Voice to follow a referendum and
constitutional reform. Implementing legislation prior to a referendum may jeopardise the
success of meaningful constitutional reform as the impetus for constitutional reform may be
diluted if enabling legislation precedes that reform.

It may also limit the scope of the referendum by establishing a Voice based on assumptions
of how any future constitutional reform would be applied and any political adjustments
required to pass the bill through Parliament. While any prior legislation could be amended
following a successful referendum, the status quo represented by such legislation would
likely affect the public’s interpretation of the referendum, and create unnecessary confusion
over process and effectiveness if the constitutional reform was different to the existing
legislation. In this way, prior legislation risks undermining the direct democratic process
envisaged in the use of referendums for constitutional change. The better approach is to
accept that the constitutional reform and enabling legislation must be treated holistically, and
be developed, and consulted on, in tandem.

The referendum can also act as a signal to political parties of the will of the Australian people
and the mandate to introduce the enabling legislation.

We submit that a referendum should be held, as indicated by the Australian Government, to
provide an opportunity for constitutional change to be effected. The referendum should be
based on an exposure draft of both the enabling legislation and the constitutional
amendment, to ensure all Australians are fully informed of the proposed changes as is
appropriate for such a significant step forward.

3 The membership model for the National Voice must ensure previously unheard
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have the same chance of being selected
as established leadership figures.

In order to add legitimacy and credibility to the National Voice, the membership model must
ensure that the membership is genuinely representative of First Nations People. It should

SXT 11317865v5 EXD

provide opportunities for ‘frontline and community-focused people to be directly involved in
national-level deliberations”.2

We submit that the models proposed by the Interim Report, comprising of a National Voice
with an advisory and consultative role to Parliament and the Australian Government and a
Local and Regional Voice providing connection with the diversity of indigenous communities,
provide an appropriate mechanism for ensuring that the National Voice is representative of
First Nations People.

The Constitutional recognition of an Indigenous Voice, endorsed by referendum by the Australian
people, represents a significant opportunity and step towards meaningful reconciliation, recognition
and unity with First Nations People. It is our privilege to contribute to this discussion in support of a
voice for First Nations people that is enshrined in and protected by the Constitution.

Russell Kennedy Lawyers
30 April 2021

2 Above n 1 p 6.
SXT 11317865v5 EXD