Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.


Submission Number
Jenny Ng
Submission date
Main Submission File
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Dr Jenny Ng
Charles Darwin University
Darwin, Northern Territory,

Date: 30 Apr. 2021

Dear Sir/ Madam

RE: Uluru Dialogue Submission

I write this submission in support of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and a Voice to Parliament.
This submission is written in my personal capacity. I think the Government’s co-design process
should take the Uluru Statement from the Heart into account when deciding on what a Voice to
Parliament should look like.

Once a model to the Voice is made, the Government should allow for a referendum. The referendum
was an election commitment that the Government has made. Hence, there is a reasonable
expectation from the people that the Government honours its election commitments. Further, to
ensure that the outcome of the referendum has legal effect, enabling legislation for the Voice must
be passed after the referendum.

Additionally, previously unheard Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people should have a chance
to be given lead roles in the membership model of the National Voice. This is imperative given that it
concerns the affairs of the Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people, and they would be the
people who know best about what their needs are and what issues there are. Speaking as a minority
and a former migrant who is now Australian, I think some rules and policies are simply the wrong fit
for minorities,1 and exemplifies how laws and policies may become unfair to some when they are
made without knowing the issues and needs of certain groups of people. Rules that are ill-fitted for
the minorities show a glaring lack of consideration for certain groups of people when such rules
were made.

Democratically elected Governments make laws that are made for the people. Laws are made for
the people and by the people. The law-making process needs to be more inclusive of the needs and
issues of minorities as they are the people too. Hence, it is important for previously unheard
Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander people to have a chance to be given lead roles in the
membership model of the National Voice.

Thank you.

Kind Regards

Dr Jenny Ng

I have written to the Australian Law Reform Commission on this point several years ago. While I do not see
the need to reiterate it in detail here as it was in relation to migrants (and this submission uses it as an
analogy), I would be glad to furnish details upon request.