2471

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2471
Participant
Atlassian
Submission date
Main Submission File
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Atlassian’s Submission to the Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process:
Interim Report to the Australian Government

Voice Secretariat
Reply Paid 83380
CANBERRA ACT 2601
By email: Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au

29 April 2021

Atlassian appreciates this opportunity to provide a submission in response to the Interim
Report to the Australian Government: Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process.
We acknowledge the work of the three co-design committees and their co-chairs Professor
Marcia Langton AM and Professor Tom Calma AO, and the significant effort undertaken to
date on the co-design process for the Indigenous Voice. We also make this submission in
support of, and informed by, the historic consensus expressed through the Uluru Statement
from the Heart (the Uluru Statement) and its invitation for all Australians to walk together
“in a movement of the Australian people for a better future”.
At Atlassian, we build enterprise software products to help teams collaborate, including for
software development, project management and content management. Our commitment to
collaboration extends beyond our own products and solutions, to ensuring that we all do
our part and work together to achieve social and environmental progress in everything we
do. As an Australian-born company, we also recognise the unique status of Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples in our country’s history, and their importance to its future.
We believe that all Australians, including those in the private sector like Atlassian, have a
responsibility to promote and facilitate reconciliation in a way that centres the voices of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. The consensus views of the Uluru Statement,
calling for a Voice to Parliament that is enshrined in the Constitution, reflect an important
and practical first step towards fulfilling this responsibility.
We therefore strongly support a referendum to enshrine the Voice in the Constitution,
once the model for the Voice has been settled. Constitutional enshrinement of the Voice
reflects the consensus position set forth in the Uluru Statement. Critically, enshrining the
Voice in the Constitution will not mean that the details of the Voice will be fixed. Instead,
the existence and function of the Voice will be protected and permitted to operate
independently, without risk of abolition through legislation and in a way that supports self-
determination. This lends legitimacy, authority and trust to the Voice and ensures its
ongoing stability and viability.
Once the current co-design process has released its Final Report, we accordingly call for
the commencement of the next stage of enactment of the Voice as follows:
● the release of an exposure draft of the enabling legislation for the Voice (but not its
passage), so that Australians can see and understand exactly what the Voice will
look like before the referendum is held;
● the release of the draft constitutional amendment that will be put to the Australian
people at a referendum; and
● confirmation of a pathway to referendum in the next term of Parliament.

We emphasise that this referendum should be held before the enabling legislation is
passed. If the legislation is passed first, this effectively divorces the two critical elements
to realising the proposal set forth in the Uluru Statement and could jeopardise the success
of the referendum.

Finally, we also endorse the recommendations and submissions from others, including
From the Heart and the Diversity Council of Australia, that the central role of all
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples to reconciliation means that the membership
model of the Voice must be robust, evidence based and account for the diversity of
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples across Australia. This means that previously
unheard Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people must have the same chance of being
heard as established leadership figures.
Atlassian recognises that, like many other Australian organisations and all Australian
citizens, we have a lot of work to do in moving towards reconciliation. We consider the
matters raised in this submission to be an important -- but above all an initial -- step in this
direction. We also remain focused on reconciliation as part of our diversity, equity and
inclusion plans for the coming financial year, and we look forward to working with the
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities to realise these goals.

Yours sincerely,

David Masters Shelley Williamson
Director of Global Policy & Regulatory Affairs Head of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
Atlassian Atlassian

89645180 2