2201

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
2201
Participant
Christopher Lynch
Submission date
Main Submission Automated Transcript

Christopher Lynch
Wurundjeri Country
Brunswick East
Victoria 3057

Dear Co-Design Body

Co-design process: Submission for Christopher Lynch

I have lived and worked in Queensland and Victoria for most of my adult life. In that time I
have been fortunate enough to learn from Indigenous Australians on Country, and come to
understand in a small way the depth of Indigenous knowledge and how little I know as an
ecologist and citizen about the land in which I live. I have also come to more deeply
appreciate the profound loss Indigenous Australians have suffered and continue to suffer
due to the dispossession of land and the ongoing suffering caused by the ignorance and
callous disregard of successive governments.

The Uluru Statement from the Heart is arguably the most important Australian document
since Federation. Speaking in one voice, Indigenous Australians (1) make a succinct and
powerful argument against the status quo, which has comprehensively failed to deliver
justice and prosperity to the original peoples of this land, (2) suggest three practical and
achievable means of delivering justice and prosperity, including a Voice to Parliament, and
(3) extend an invitation to their dispossessors to listen and work towards a better future for
all Australians.

The Voice to Parliament is central to that better future. Firstly, it is important for Indigenous
Australians to be consulted directly about matters that affect them. Successive governments
have failed to do so, and the results of this failure speak for themselves. As the Statement
itself notes, Indigenous Australians are proportionately the most incarcerated people on the
planet. Closing the Gap targets continue to be missed. Non-indigenous Australians have
comprehensively failed to deliver.

In addition, non-indigenous Australians for the most part do not understand Country, and
continue to enact policies such as fire-management regimes that are catastrophically ill-
conceived. A Voice to Parliament for Indigenous Australians is not simply about health,
education, and justice for some Australians, but about drawing on the expertise of people
who understand how to manage the land on which we live in a time of change. We will all
benefit on a very practical level from a Voice to Parliament. It will also contribute to a sense
of pride in being Australian. Our New Zealand neighbours show us how a deeper respect for
Indigenous culture leads to a stronger, healthier, and more relaxed sense of national
identity. How can we be proud of being Australian while Indigenous Australians remain
second-class citizens?

I believe it's important to enshrine the Voice to Parliament in the Constitution because very
recent history shows us that legislation fails to preserve Indigenous consultation over the
time span of a single generation, let alone decades and centuries. ATSIC lasted 15 years
before it was abolished, and successive bodies such as the Office of Indigenous Policy
Coordination and National Indigenous Council have managed about five years. This is not
good enough. However, regardless of policy outcomes the simple fact of the matter is that
Indigenous Australians have been here for more than 60,000 years and deserve to be
included in the Constitution of Australia. This is a historic opportunity, and Australia as a
whole needs to listen to our Indigenous brothers and sisters and together create a better
future.

Creating a constitutionally protected Voice to Parliament is the right thing to do. We need to
get our act together and get on with it.

Yours sincerely,
Chris Lynch