1042

Submissions: Your Feedback

Submissions from people and organisations who have agreed to have their feedback published are provided below.

The views expressed in these submissions belong to their authors. The National Indigenous Australians Agency reserved the right not to publish submissions, or parts of submissions, that include, for example, material that is offensive, racist, potentially defamatory, personal information, is a copy of previously provided materials, or does not relate to the consultation process.

An auto-generated transcript of submissions provided as attachments has been made available to assist with accessibility. These transcripts may contain transcription errors. Please refer to the source file for the original content.

Please note not all submissions are provided in an attachment. For submissions without an attachment, click on the name of the person or organisation to view the text.

Site functionality has recently been improved. You can now search by participant name and submission number. You can also click on the number, date and participant column headings to sort the order of submissions.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that submissions may contain images or names of deceased people.

If you require any further assistance please contact Co-designVoice@niaa.gov.au.

 

Submission Number
1042
Participant
Clayton Hairs
Submission date

I have lived in this wonderful country for nearly 12 years now.

I am beyond shocked that a country occupied for possibly 40,000 GENERATIONS do not, at the VERY minimum, have a DIRECT means whereby their voices might be heard in the nations' capital.

I would have thought this was a pre-requisite to the very formation of the country itself - in its founding constitution - what an astounding oversight!

In a country that prides itself on 'a fair go' and 'mateship' ie. looking out for one another - it is a SERIOUS omission.

What that mechanism or the details of how that voice might be actioned is NOT of importance in the first instance - allowing this to be an organic and evolutionary adaptation is sensible and mature.

What is required NOW, in the first instance, is a referendum, one that I understand was promised during the previous election. Thereafter enabling legislation might follow via a consultative process.

It is crucial in this second phase that ALL First Australians are permitted agency to be selected in the process of legislation creation, in particular, that means enabling those that are most marginalised and previously unheard from and NOT just turning to the 'usual suspects'.

It is time to set things to rights and, to borrow another Australian-ism, to "do the right thing" by those who have looked after this land since time-immorial.

Sincerely
Clayton Hairs